CTEs: The RAM-Hogging Culprits in Your Queries

Common Table Expressions are widely used but there's a prevalent misconception about their memory handling. Learn why CTEs can be inefficient in your queries.

CTEs: Addressing a Common SQL Misconception

Understanding CTEs and Their Impact

Common Table Expressions (CTEs) are widely used in SQL to simplify complex queries and enhance readability. However, there's a prevalent misconception about how they handle memory and execution.

The query executed in step 1 needs to be stored somewhere, which is the RAM. It occupies space (let's say 6 containers) and stays there until the query completes. This space remains occupied, whether it's being actively used or not. Now, the remainder of the query has only 6 containers to process the rest of the data.

CTE Example

Using a Subquery Instead:

The query at any point has the entirety of 12 containers to process the data. More containers mean faster execution—here, potentially 2x faster because the query processes in parallel. Imagine each container processes 10 GB. Even if the subquery portion needs to be executed twice, there's sufficient processing space, and once completed, the rest of the query has all 12 containers available.

This not only saves runtime but also optimizes query performance.

Best Practices

To optimize performance and manage memory effectively:

BK

Balaji Kasiraj

Senior Product and Business Analyst with 6+ years of experience in Analytics. He owns and operates SQL Online, helping thousands of developers format and optimize their SQL queries.